-
Dave Hansen authored
The erratum we are fixing here can lead to stray setting of the A and D bits. That means that a pte that we cleared might suddenly have A/D set. So, stop considering those bits when determining if a pte is pte_none(). The same goes for the other pmd_none() and pud_none(). pgd_none() can be skipped because it is not affected; we do not use PGD entries for anything other than pagetables on affected configurations. This adds a tiny amount of overhead to all pte_none() checks. I doubt we'll be able to measure it anywhere. Signed-off-by:
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: mhocko@suse.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160708001912.5216F89C@viggo.jf.intel.comSigned-off-by:
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
97e3c602