-
Paulo Zanoni authored
Previously we had has_pch_split to tell us whether we had a PCH or not and we also had dev_priv->pch_type to tell us which kind of PCH it was, but it could only be used if we were 100% sure we did have a PCH. Now that PCH_NONE was added to dev_priv->pch_type we don't need has_pch_split anymore: we can just check for pch_type != PCH_NONE. The HAS_PCH_{IBX,CPT,LPT} macros use dev_priv->pch_type, so they can only be called after intel_detect_pch. The HAS_PCH_SPLIT macro looks at dev_priv->info->has_pch_split, which is available earlier. Since the goal is to implement HAS_PCH_SPLIT using dev_priv->pch_type instead of dev_priv->info->has_pch_split, we need to make sure that intel_detect_pch is called before any calls to HAS_PCH_SPLIT are made. So we moved the intel_detect_pch call to an earlier stage. Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
45e6e3a1