-
Srivatsa S. Bhat authored
__cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() handles the kobject cleanup for a CPU going offline. But because we destroy the kobject towards the end of the CPU offline phase, there are certain race windows where a task can try to write to a cpufreq sysfs file (eg: using store_scaling_max_freq()) while we are taking that CPU offline, and this can bump up the kobject refcount, which in turn might hinder the CPU offline task from running to completion. (It can also cause other more serious problems such as trying to acquire a destroyed timer-mutex etc., depending on the exact stage of the cleanup at which the task managed to take a new refcount). To fix the race window, we will need to synchronize those store_*() call-sites with CPU hotplug, using get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus(). However, that in turn can cause a total deadlock because it can end up waiting for the CPU offline task to complete, with incremented refcount! Write to sysfs CPU offline task -------------- ---------------- kobj_refcnt++ Acquire cpu_hotplug.lock get_online_cpus(); Wait for kobj_refcnt to drop to zero **DEADLOCK** A simple way to avoid this problem is to perform the kobject cleanup in the CPU offline path, with the cpu_hotplug.lock *released*. That is, we can perform the wait-for-kobj-refcnt-to-drop as well as the subsequent cleanup in the CPU_POST_DEAD stage of CPU offline, which is run with cpu_hotplug.lock released. Doing this helps us avoid deadlocks due to holding kobject refcounts and waiting on each other on the cpu_hotplug.lock. (Note: We can't move all of the cpufreq CPU offline steps to the CPU_POST_DEAD stage, because certain things such as stopping the governors have to be done before the outgoing CPU is marked offline. So retain those parts in the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE stage itself). Reported-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
1aee40ac