-
Chris Wilson authored
Instead of relying on the caller holding struct_mutex across the allocation, push the allocation under a tree of spinlocks stored inside the page tables. Not only should this allow us to avoid struct_mutex here, but it will allow multiple users to lock independent ranges for concurrent allocations, and operate independently. This is vital for pushing the GTT manipulation into a background thread where dependency on struct_mutex is verboten, and for allowing other callers to avoid struct_mutex altogether. v2: Restore lost GEM_BUG_ON for removing too many PTE from gen6_ppgtt_clear_range. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190604153830.19096-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
1d1b5490