-
Ben Widawsky authored
This behavior of checking for a shmem backed GEM object was introduced here: commit 4c914c0c Author: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Date: Tue Feb 18 10:15:45 2014 -0800 drm/i915: Refactor shmem pread setup It is possible for an object to not be a shmem backed GEM object (for example userptr objects). An example of how we hit this failure can be found through copy_batch() in the command parser because we allocate a userptr object for the batch which contains privileged instructions. Userptr calls drm_gem_private_object_init() which explicitly sets the filp to none. NOTE: I manually retyped this from a test machine. So I haven't even compiled this exact patch. v2: Use same logic as from a2a4f916c2f (Kristian, Dave Gordon) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> Tested-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com> (v1) Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com> (v1) Signed-off-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455047053-2644-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com
1db6e2e7