syzbot is reporting UAF at usb_submit_urb() [1], for
service_outstanding_interrupt() is not checking WDM_DISCONNECTING
before calling usb_submit_urb(). Close the race by doing same checks
wdm_read() does upon retry.

Also, while wdm_read() checks WDM_DISCONNECTING with desc->rlock held,
service_interrupt_work() does not hold desc->rlock. Thus, it is possible
that usb_submit_urb() is called from service_outstanding_interrupt() from
service_interrupt_work() after WDM_DISCONNECTING was set and kill_urbs()
 from wdm_disconnect() completed. Thus, move kill_urbs() in
wdm_disconnect() to after cancel_work_sync() (which makes sure that
service_interrupt_work() is no longer running) completed.

Although it seems to be safe to dereference desc->intf->dev in
service_outstanding_interrupt() even if WDM_DISCONNECTING was already set
because desc->rlock or cancel_work_sync() prevents wdm_disconnect() from
reaching list_del() before service_outstanding_interrupt() completes,
let's not emit error message if WDM_DISCONNECTING is set by
wdm_disconnect() while usb_submit_urb() is in progress.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9e04e2df4a32fb661dafReported-by: syzbot <syzbot+9e04e2df4a32fb661daf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/620e2ee0-b9a3-dbda-a25b-a93e0ed03ec5@i-love.sakura.ne.jpSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>