-
Peter Zijlstra authored
What happens is that we schedule badly like: <...>-1987 [019] 280.252808: x86_pmu_start: event-46/1300c0: idx: 0 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252811: x86_pmu_start: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252812: x86_pmu_start: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252813: x86_pmu_start: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252814: x86_pmu_start: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252825: x86_pmu_stop: event-46/1300c0: idx: 0 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252826: x86_pmu_stop: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252827: x86_pmu_stop: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252828: x86_pmu_stop: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252829: x86_pmu_stop: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252834: x86_pmu_start: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252834: x86_pmu_start: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252835: x86_pmu_start: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252836: x86_pmu_start: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252837: x86_pmu_start: event-51/1300c0: idx: 32 *FAIL* This happens because we only iterate the n_running events in the first pass, and reset their index to -1 if they don't match to force a re-assignment. Now, in our RR example, n_running == 0 because we fully unscheduled, so event-50 will retain its idx==32, even though in scheduling it will have gotten idx=0, and we don't trigger the re-assign path. The easiest way to fix this is the below patch, which simply validates the full assignment in the second pass. Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268311069.5037.31.camel@laptop> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
45e16a68