=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.26-rc4 #30
---------------------------------------------
heap-overflow/2250 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&mm->page_table_lock){--..}, at: [<c0000000000cf2e8>] .copy_hugetlb_page_range+0x108/0x280

but task is already holding lock:
 (&mm->page_table_lock){--..}, at: [<c0000000000cf2dc>] .copy_hugetlb_page_range+0xfc/0x280

other info that might help us debug this:
3 locks held by heap-overflow/2250:
 #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<c000000000050e44>] .dup_mm+0x134/0x410
 #1:  (&mm->mmap_sem/1){--..}, at: [<c000000000050e54>] .dup_mm+0x144/0x410
 #2:  (&mm->page_table_lock){--..}, at: [<c0000000000cf2dc>] .copy_hugetlb_page_range+0xfc/0x280

stack backtrace:
Call Trace:
[c00000003b2774e0] [c000000000010ce4] .show_stack+0x74/0x1f0 (unreliable)
[c00000003b2775a0] [c0000000003f10e0] .dump_stack+0x20/0x34
[c00000003b277620] [c0000000000889bc] .__lock_acquire+0xaac/0x1080
[c00000003b277740] [c000000000089000] .lock_acquire+0x70/0xb0
[c00000003b2777d0] [c0000000003ee15c] ._spin_lock+0x4c/0x80
[c00000003b277870] [c0000000000cf2e8] .copy_hugetlb_page_range+0x108/0x280
[c00000003b277950] [c0000000000bcaa8] .copy_page_range+0x558/0x790
[c00000003b277ac0] [c000000000050fe0] .dup_mm+0x2d0/0x410
[c00000003b277ba0] [c000000000051d24] .copy_process+0xb94/0x1020
[c00000003b277ca0] [c000000000052244] .do_fork+0x94/0x310
[c00000003b277db0] [c000000000011240] .sys_clone+0x60/0x80
[c00000003b277e30] [c0000000000078c4] .ppc_clone+0x8/0xc

Fix is the same way that mm/memory.c copy_page_range does the
lockdep annotation.
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>