-
Bryan O'Sullivan authored
Do an extra check to see if in-memory tail changed while processing packets, and if so, going back through the loop again (but only once per call to ipath_kreceive()). In practice, this seems to be enough to guarantee that if we crossed the clearing of an interrupt at start of ipath_intr with a scheduled tail register update, that we'll process the "extra" packet that lost the interrupt because we cleared it just as it was about to arrive. Signed-off-by: Dave Olson <dave.olson@qlogic.com> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Sullivan <bryan.osullivan@qlogic.com> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il> Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
57abad25