One of the kmemleak changes caused the following
scheduling-while-holding-the-tasklist-lock regression on x86:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/kmemleak.c:795
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1737, name: kmemleak
2 locks held by kmemleak/1737:
 #0:  (scan_mutex){......}, at: [<c10c4376>] kmemleak_scan_thread+0x45/0x86
 #1:  (tasklist_lock){......}, at: [<c10c3bb4>] kmemleak_scan+0x1a9/0x39c
Pid: 1737, comm: kmemleak Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1-tip #59266
Call Trace:
 [<c105ac0f>] ? __debug_show_held_locks+0x1e/0x20
 [<c102e490>] __might_sleep+0x10a/0x111
 [<c10c38d5>] scan_yield+0x17/0x3b
 [<c10c3970>] scan_block+0x39/0xd4
 [<c10c3bc6>] kmemleak_scan+0x1bb/0x39c
 [<c10c4331>] ? kmemleak_scan_thread+0x0/0x86
 [<c10c437b>] kmemleak_scan_thread+0x4a/0x86
 [<c104d73e>] kthread+0x6e/0x73
 [<c104d6d0>] ? kthread+0x0/0x73
 [<c100959f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
kmemleak: 834 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)

The bit causing it is highly dubious:

static void scan_yield(void)
{
        might_sleep();

        if (time_is_before_eq_jiffies(next_scan_yield)) {
                schedule();
                next_scan_yield = jiffies + jiffies_scan_yield;
        }
}

It called deep inside the codepath and in a conditional way,
and that is what crapped up when one of the new scan_block()
uses grew a tasklist_lock dependency.

This minimal patch removes that yielding stuff and adds the
proper cond_resched().

The background scanning thread could probably also be reniced
to +10.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>