As noted by David:

pte_page() is a macro defined as follows;

    include/asm-sh/pgtable.h
    #define pte_page(x)    phys_to_page(pte_val(x)&PTE_PHYS_MASK)

    include/asm-sh/page.h
    #define phys_to_page(phys)    (pfn_to_page(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT))

So as you can see the phys_to_page() macro doesn't wrap the 'phys'
parameter in parentheses so we end up with;

    pte_val(x)&PTE_PHYS_MASK >> PAGE_SHIFT

Which is not what we wanted as '>>' has a higher precedence than bitwise
AND. I dug into the git repository and I believe this bug was added with
this commit (104b8dea);

2006-03-27 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page: sh pfn_to_page

-#define phys_to_page(phys)     (mem_map + (((phys)-__MEMORY_START) >>
PAGE_SHIFT))
-#define page_to_phys(page)     (((page - mem_map) << PAGE_SHIFT) +
__MEMORY_START)
+#define phys_to_page(phys)     (pfn_to_page(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT))
+#define page_to_phys(page)     (page_to_pfn(page) << PAGE_SHIFT)
Reported-by: David ADDISON <david.addison@st.com>
Reported-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>