-
Kosuke Tatsukawa authored
async_pf_execute() seems to be missing a memory barrier which might cause the waker to not notice the waiter and miss sending a wake_up as in the following figure. async_pf_execute kvm_vcpu_block ------------------------------------------------------------------------ spin_lock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock); if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq)) /* The CPU might reorder the test for the waitqueue up here, before prior writes complete */ prepare_to_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); /*if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0) */ /*if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) { */ ... return (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE && !vcpu->arch.apf.halted) || !list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done) ... return 0; list_add_tail(&apf->link, &vcpu->async_pf.done); spin_unlock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock); waited = true; schedule(); ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The attached patch adds the missing memory barrier. I found this issue when I was looking through the linux source code for places calling waitqueue_active() before wake_up*(), but without preceding memory barriers, after sending a patch to fix a similar issue in drivers/tty/n_tty.c (Details about the original issue can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/28/849). Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@ab.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
6003a420