-
Xiao Guangrong authored
In no-direct mapping, we mark sp is 'direct' when we mapping the guest's larger page, but its access is encoded form upper page-struct entire not include the last mapping, it will cause access conflict. For example, have this mapping: [W] / PDE1 -> |---| P[W] | | LPA \ PDE2 -> |---| [R] P have two children, PDE1 and PDE2, both PDE1 and PDE2 mapping the same lage page(LPA). The P's access is WR, PDE1's access is WR, PDE2's access is RO(just consider read-write permissions here) When guest access PDE1, we will create a direct sp for LPA, the sp's access is from P, is W, then we will mark the ptes is W in this sp. Then, guest access PDE2, we will find LPA's shadow page, is the same as PDE's, and mark the ptes is RO. So, if guest access PDE1, the incorrect #PF is occured. Fixed by encode the last mapping access into direct shadow page Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
6aa0b9de