Typically a switch table can be found by detecting a .rodata access
followed an indirect jump:

    1969:	4a 8b 0c e5 00 00 00 	mov    0x0(,%r12,8),%rcx
    1970:	00
			196d: R_X86_64_32S	.rodata+0x438
    1971:	e9 00 00 00 00       	jmpq   1976 <dispc_runtime_suspend+0xb6a>
			1972: R_X86_64_PC32	__x86_indirect_thunk_rcx-0x4

Randy Dunlap reported a case (seen with GCC 4.8) where the .rodata
access uses RIP-relative addressing:

    19bd:	48 8b 3d 00 00 00 00 	mov    0x0(%rip),%rdi        # 19c4 <dispc_runtime_suspend+0xbb8>
			19c0: R_X86_64_PC32	.rodata+0x45c
    19c4:	e9 00 00 00 00       	jmpq   19c9 <dispc_runtime_suspend+0xbbd>
			19c5: R_X86_64_PC32	__x86_indirect_thunk_rdi-0x4

In this case the relocation addend needs to be adjusted accordingly in
order to find the location of the switch table.

The fix is for case 3 (as described in the comments), but also make the
existing case 1 & 2 checks more precise by only adjusting the addend for
R_X86_64_PC32 relocations.

This fixes the following warnings:

  drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dispc.o: warning: objtool: dispc_runtime_suspend()+0xbb8: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
  drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dispc.o: warning: objtool: dispc_runtime_resume()+0xcc5: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b6098294fd67afb69af8c47c9883d7a68bf0f8ea.1526305958.git.jpoimboe@redhat.comSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>