The DHCOM SoM has two options for supplying ETHRX clock to the DWMAC
block and PHY. Either (1) ETHCK_K generates 50 MHz clock on ETH_CLK
pad for the PHY and the same 50 MHz clock are fed back to ETHRX via
internal eth_clk_fb clock connection OR (2) ETH_CLK is not used at
all, MCO2 generates 50 MHz clock on MCO2 output pad for the PHY and
the same MCO2 clock are fed back into ETHRX via ETH_RX_CLK input pad
using external pad-to-pad connection.

Option (1) has two downsides. ETHCK_K is supplied directly from either
PLL3_Q or PLL4_P, hence the PLL output is limited to exactly 50 MHz and
since the same PLL output is also used to supply SDMMC blocks, the
performance of SD and eMMC access is affected. The second downside is
that using this option, the EMI of the SoM is higher.

Option (2) solves both of those problems, so implement it here. In this
case, the PLL4_P is no longer limited and can be operated faster, at
100 MHz, which improves SDMMC performance (read performance is improved
from ~41 MiB/s to ~57 MiB/s with dd if=/dev/mmcblk1 of=/dev/null bs=64M
count=1). The EMI interference also decreases.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@foss.st.com>
Cc: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Cc: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Tested-by: Johann Neuhauser <jneuhauser@dh-electronics.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>