There is a potential race between fuse_read_interrupt() and
fuse_request_end().

TASK1
  in fuse_read_interrupt(): delete req->intr_entry (while holding
  fiq->lock)

TASK2
  in fuse_request_end(): req->intr_entry is empty -> skip fiq->lock
  wake up TASK3

TASK3
  request is freed

TASK1
  in fuse_read_interrupt(): dereference req->in.h.unique ***BAM***


Fix by always grabbing fiq->lock if the request was ever interrupted
(FR_INTERRUPTED set) thereby serializing with concurrent
fuse_read_interrupt() calls.

FR_INTERRUPTED is set before the request is queued on fiq->interrupts.
Dequeing the request is done with list_del_init() but FR_INTERRUPTED is not
cleared in this case.
Reported-by: lijiazi <lijiazi@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>