The thin-pool target doesn't display the data block size as part of
its table status, unlike the dm-cache target, so there is no need for
dm_pool_get_data_block_size().

This was found using cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>