• David Hildenbrand's avatar
    s390/uv: convert gmap_destroy_page() from follow_page() to folio_walk · 85a7e543
    David Hildenbrand authored
    Let's get rid of another follow_page() user and perform the UV calls under
    PTL -- which likely should be fine.
    
    No need for an additional reference while holding the PTL:
    uv_destroy_folio() and uv_convert_from_secure_folio() raise the refcount,
    so any concurrent make_folio_secure() would see an unexpted reference and
    cannot set PG_arch_1 concurrently.
    
    Do we really need a writable PTE?  Likely yes, because the "destroy" part
    is, in comparison to the export, a destructive operation.  So we'll keep
    the writability check for now.
    
    We'll lose the secretmem check from follow_page().  Likely we don't care
    about that here.
    
    Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240802155524.517137-9-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
    Reviewed-by: default avatarClaudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
    Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
    Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
    Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
    Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
    Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
    Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
    Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
    Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
    Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
    Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
    Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    85a7e543
uv.c 21.3 KB