-
Frank Li authored
========================================================= [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] 3.8.0-rc5+ #82 Not tainted --------------------------------------------------------- swapper/0/0 just changed the state of lock: (&(&fep->hw_lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<8034e2f8>] fec_enet_start_xmit+0x48/0x 2cc but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past: (prepare_lock){+.+.+.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(prepare_lock); local_irq_disable() lock(&(&fep->hw_lock)->rlock); lock(prepare_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&(&fep->hw_lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
85bd1798