commit feb92d7d "(ARC: perf: don't bail setup if pct irq
missing in device-tree)" introduced a silly brown-paper bag bug:
The assignment and comparison in an if statement were not bracketed
correctly leaving the order of evaluation undefined.

|
| if (has_interrupts && (irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0) >= 0)) {
|                           ^^^                         ^^^^

And given such a chance, the compiler will bite you hard, fully entitled
to generating this piece of beauty:

|
| # if (has_interrupts && (irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0) >= 0)) {
|
| bl.d @platform_get_irq  <-- irq returned in r0
|
| setge r2, r0, 0   	<-- r2 is bool 1 or 0 if irq >= 0 true/false
| brlt.d r0, 0, @.L114
|
| st_s	r2,[sp]    	<-- irq saved is bool 1 or 0, not actual return val
| st	1,[r3,160]   	# arc_pmu.18_29->irq <-- drops bool and assumes 1
|
| # return __request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, 0,
|
| bl.d @__request_percpu_irq;
| mov_s	r0,1	   <-- drops even bool and assumes 1 which fails

With the snafu fixed, everything is as expected.

| bl.d @platform_get_irq	<-- returns irq in r0
|
| mov_s	r2,r0
| brlt.d r2, 0, @.L112
|
| st_s	r0,[sp]			<-- irq isaved is actual return value above
| st	r0,[r13,160]	#arc_pmu.18_27->irq
|
| bl.d @__request_percpu_irq	<-- r0 unchanged so actual irq returned
| add r4,r4,r12	#, tmp363, __ptr

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>