This fixes a regression introduced by commit f7fec032.  The
problem was that the extents status flags caused us to mask out block
numbers smaller than 2**28 blocks.  Since we didn't test with file
systems smaller than 512GB, we didn't notice this during the
development cycle.

A typical failure looks like this:

EXT4-fs error (device sdb1): htree_dirblock_to_tree:919: inode #172235804: block
152052301: comm ls: bad entry in directory: rec_len is smaller than minimal -
offset=0(0), inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0

... where 'debugfs -R "stat <172235804>" /dev/sdb1' reports that the
inode has block number 688923213.  When viewed in hex, block number
152052301 (from the syslog) is 0x910224D, while block number 688923213
is 0x2910224D.  Note the missing "0x20000000" in the block number.
Reported-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Verified-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Verified-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>