• Tejun Heo's avatar
    workqueue: fix subtle pool management issue which can stall whole worker_pool · 8fdd4f77
    Tejun Heo authored
    commit 29187a9e upstream.
    
    A worker_pool's forward progress is guaranteed by the fact that the
    last idle worker assumes the manager role to create more workers and
    summon the rescuers if creating workers doesn't succeed in timely
    manner before proceeding to execute work items.
    
    This manager role is implemented in manage_workers(), which indicates
    whether the worker may proceed to work item execution with its return
    value.  This is necessary because multiple workers may contend for the
    manager role, and, if there already is a manager, others should
    proceed to work item execution.
    
    Unfortunately, the function also indicates that the worker may proceed
    to work item execution if need_to_create_worker() is false at the head
    of the function.  need_to_create_worker() tests the following
    conditions.
    
    	pending work items && !nr_running && !nr_idle
    
    The first and third conditions are protected by pool->lock and thus
    won't change while holding pool->lock; however, nr_running can change
    asynchronously as other workers block and resume and while it's likely
    to be zero, as someone woke this worker up in the first place, some
    other workers could have become runnable inbetween making it non-zero.
    
    If this happens, manage_worker() could return false even with zero
    nr_idle making the worker, the last idle one, proceed to execute work
    items.  If then all workers of the pool end up blocking on a resource
    which can only be released by a work item which is pending on that
    pool, the whole pool can deadlock as there's no one to create more
    workers or summon the rescuers.
    
    This patch fixes the problem by removing the early exit condition from
    maybe_create_worker() and making manage_workers() return false iff
    there's already another manager, which ensures that the last worker
    doesn't start executing work items.
    
    We can leave the early exit condition alone and just ignore the return
    value but the only reason it was put there is because the
    manage_workers() used to perform both creations and destructions of
    workers and thus the function may be invoked while the pool is trying
    to reduce the number of workers.  Now that manage_workers() is called
    only when more workers are needed, the only case this early exit
    condition is triggered is rare race conditions rendering it pointless.
    
    Tested with simulated workload and modified workqueue code which
    trigger the pool deadlock reliably without this patch.
    Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
    Reported-by: default avatarEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/54B019F4.8030009@sandeen.net
    Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
    Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    8fdd4f77
workqueue.c 135 KB