This patch replaces/reworks the kernel-internal BPF interpreter with
an optimized BPF instruction set format that is modelled closer to
mimic native instruction sets and is designed to be JITed with one to
one mapping. Thus, the new interpreter is noticeably faster than the
current implementation of sk_run_filter(); mainly for two reasons:

1. Fall-through jumps:

  BPF jump instructions are forced to go either 'true' or 'false'
  branch which causes branch-miss penalty. The new BPF jump
  instructions have only one branch and fall-through otherwise,
  which fits the CPU branch predictor logic better. `perf stat`
  shows drastic difference for branch-misses between the old and
  new code.

2. Jump-threaded implementation of interpreter vs switch
   statement:

  Instead of single table-jump at the top of 'switch' statement,
  gcc will now generate multiple table-jump instructions, which
  helps CPU branch predictor logic.

Note that the verification of filters is still being done through
sk_chk_filter() in classical BPF format, so filters from user- or
kernel space are verified in the same way as we do now, and same
restrictions/constraints hold as well.

We reuse current BPF JIT compilers in a way that this upgrade would
even be fine as is, but nevertheless allows for a successive upgrade
of BPF JIT compilers to the new format.

The internal instruction set migration is being done after the
probing for JIT compilation, so in case JIT compilers are able to
create a native opcode image, we're going to use that, and in all
other cases we're doing a follow-up migration of the BPF program's
instruction set, so that it can be transparently run in the new
interpreter.

In short, the *internal* format extends BPF in the following way (more
details can be taken from the appended documentation):

  - Number of registers increase from 2 to 10
  - Register width increases from 32-bit to 64-bit
  - Conditional jt/jf targets replaced with jt/fall-through
  - Adds signed > and >= insns
  - 16 4-byte stack slots for register spill-fill replaced
    with up to 512 bytes of multi-use stack space
  - Introduction of bpf_call insn and register passing convention
    for zero overhead calls from/to other kernel functions
  - Adds arithmetic right shift and endianness conversion insns
  - Adds atomic_add insn
  - Old tax/txa insns are replaced with 'mov dst,src' insn

Performance of two BPF filters generated by libpcap resp. bpf_asm
was measured on x86_64, i386 and arm32 (other libpcap programs
have similar performance differences):

fprog #1 is taken from Documentation/networking/filter.txt:
tcpdump -i eth0 port 22 -dd

fprog #2 is taken from 'man tcpdump':
tcpdump -i eth0 'tcp port 22 and (((ip[2:2] - ((ip[0]&0xf)<<2)) -
   ((tcp[12]&0xf0)>>2)) != 0)' -dd

Raw performance data from BPF micro-benchmark: SK_RUN_FILTER on the
same SKB (cache-hit) or 10k SKBs (cache-miss); time in ns per call,
smaller is better:

--x86_64--
         fprog #1  fprog #1   fprog #2  fprog #2
         cache-hit cache-miss cache-hit cache-miss
old BPF      90       101        192       202
new BPF      31        71         47        97
old BPF jit  12        34         17        44
new BPF jit TBD

--i386--
         fprog #1  fprog #1   fprog #2  fprog #2
         cache-hit cache-miss cache-hit cache-miss
old BPF     107       136        227       252
new BPF      40       119         69       172

--arm32--
         fprog #1  fprog #1   fprog #2  fprog #2
         cache-hit cache-miss cache-hit cache-miss
old BPF     202       300        475       540
new BPF     180       270        330       470
old BPF jit  26       182         37       202
new BPF jit TBD

Thus, without changing any userland BPF filters, applications on
top of AF_PACKET (or other families) such as libpcap/tcpdump, cls_bpf
classifier, netfilter's xt_bpf, team driver's load-balancing mode,
and many more will have better interpreter filtering performance.

While we are replacing the internal BPF interpreter, we also need
to convert seccomp BPF in the same step to make use of the new
internal structure since it makes use of lower-level API details
without being further decoupled through higher-level calls like
sk_unattached_filter_{create,destroy}(), for example.

Just as for normal socket filtering, also seccomp BPF experiences
a time-to-verdict speedup:

05-sim-long_jumps.c of libseccomp was used as micro-benchmark:

  seccomp_rule_add_exact(ctx,...
  seccomp_rule_add_exact(ctx,...

  rc = seccomp_load(ctx);

  for (i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
     syscall(199, 100);

'short filter' has 2 rules
'large filter' has 200 rules

'short filter' performance is slightly better on x86_64/i386/arm32
'large filter' is much faster on x86_64 and i386 and shows no
               difference on arm32

--x86_64-- short filter
old BPF: 2.7 sec
 39.12%  bench  libc-2.15.so       [.] syscall
  8.10%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sk_run_filter
  6.31%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] system_call
  5.59%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] trace_hardirqs_on_caller
  4.37%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] trace_hardirqs_off_caller
  3.70%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __secure_computing
  3.67%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] lock_is_held
  3.03%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] seccomp_bpf_load
new BPF: 2.58 sec
 42.05%  bench  libc-2.15.so       [.] syscall
  6.91%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] system_call
  6.25%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] trace_hardirqs_on_caller
  6.07%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __secure_computing
  5.08%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sk_run_filter_int_seccomp

--arm32-- short filter
old BPF: 4.0 sec
 39.92%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] vector_swi
 16.60%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sk_run_filter
 14.66%  bench  libc-2.17.so       [.] syscall
  5.42%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] seccomp_bpf_load
  5.10%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __secure_computing
new BPF: 3.7 sec
 35.93%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] vector_swi
 21.89%  bench  libc-2.17.so       [.] syscall
 13.45%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sk_run_filter_int_seccomp
  6.25%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __secure_computing
  3.96%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] syscall_trace_exit

--x86_64-- large filter
old BPF: 8.6 seconds
    73.38%    bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sk_run_filter
    10.70%    bench  libc-2.15.so       [.] syscall
     5.09%    bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] seccomp_bpf_load
     1.97%    bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] system_call
new BPF: 5.7 seconds
    66.20%    bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sk_run_filter_int_seccomp
    16.75%    bench  libc-2.15.so       [.] syscall
     3.31%    bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] system_call
     2.88%    bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __secure_computing

--i386-- large filter
old BPF: 5.4 sec
new BPF: 3.8 sec

--arm32-- large filter
old BPF: 13.5 sec
 73.88%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sk_run_filter
 10.29%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] vector_swi
  6.46%  bench  libc-2.17.so       [.] syscall
  2.94%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] seccomp_bpf_load
  1.19%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __secure_computing
  0.87%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sys_getuid
new BPF: 13.5 sec
 76.08%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sk_run_filter_int_seccomp
 10.98%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] vector_swi
  5.87%  bench  libc-2.17.so       [.] syscall
  1.77%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __secure_computing
  0.93%  bench  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sys_getuid

BPF filters generated by seccomp are very branchy, so the new
internal BPF performance is better than the old one. Performance
gains will be even higher when BPF JIT is committed for the
new structure, which is planned in future work (as successive
JIT migrations).

BPF has also been stress-tested with trinity's BPF fuzzer.

Joint work with Daniel Borkmann.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>