-
Paul Gortmaker authored
We have a mismatch between RCU and isolation -- in relation to what is considered the maximum valid CPU number. This matters because nohz_full= and rcu_nocbs= are joined at the hip; in fact the former will enforce the latter. So we don't want a CPU mask to be valid for one and denied for the other. The difference 1st appeared as of v4.15; further details are below. As it is confusing to anyone who isn't looking at the code regularly, a reminder is in order; three values exist here: CONFIG_NR_CPUS - compiled in maximum cap on number of CPUs supported. nr_cpu_ids - possible # of CPUs (typically reflects what ACPI says) cpus_present - actual number of present/detected/installed CPUs. For this example, I'll refer to NR_CPUS=64 from "make defconfig" and nr_cpu_ids=6 for ACPI reporting on a board that could run a six core, and present=4 for a quad that is physically in the socket. From dmesg: smpboot: Allowing 6 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:64 nr_cpumask_bits:64 nr_cpu_ids:6 nr_node_ids:1 rcu: RCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=64 to nr_cpu_ids=6. smp: Brought up 1 node, 4 CPUs And from userspace, see: paul@trash:/sys/devices/system/cpu$ cat present 0-3 paul@trash:/sys/devices/system/cpu$ cat possible 0-5 paul@trash:/sys/devices/system/cpu$ cat kernel_max 63 Everything is fine if we boot 5x5 for rcu/nohz: Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage nohz_full=2-5 rcu_nocbs=2-5 root=/dev/sda1 ro NO_HZ: Full dynticks CPUs: 2-5. rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 2-5. ..even though there is no CPU 4 or 5. Both RCU and nohz_full are OK. Now we push that > 6 but less than NR_CPU and with 15x15 we get: Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage rcu_nocbs=2-15 nohz_full=2-15 root=/dev/sda1 ro rcu: Note: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs. rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 2-5. These are both functionally equivalent, as we are only changing flags on phantom CPUs that don't exist, but note the kernel interpretation changes. And worse, it only changes for one of the two - which is the problem. RCU doesn't care if you want to restrict the flags on phantom CPUs but clearly nohz_full does after this change from v4.15. edb93821: ("sched/isolation: Move isolcpus= handling to the housekeeping code") - if (cpulist_parse(str, non_housekeeping_mask) < 0) { - pr_warn("Housekeeping: Incorrect nohz_full cpumask\n"); + err = cpulist_parse(str, non_housekeeping_mask); + if (err < 0 || cpumask_last(non_housekeeping_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) { + pr_warn("Housekeeping: nohz_full= or isolcpus= incorrect CPU range\n"); To be clear, the sanity check on "possible" (nr_cpu_ids) is new here. The goal was reasonable ; not wanting housekeeping to land on a not-possible CPU, but note two things: 1) this is an exclusion list, not an inclusion list; we are tracking non_housekeeping CPUs; not ones who are explicitly assigned housekeeping 2) we went one further in 9219565a ("sched/isolation: Require a present CPU in housekeeping mask") - ensuring that housekeeping was sanity checking against present and not just possible CPUs. To be clear, this means the check added in v4.15 is doubly redundant. And more importantly, overly strict/restrictive. We care now, because the bitmap boot arg parsing now knows that a value of "N" is NR_CPUS; the size of the bitmap, but the bitmap code doesn't know anything about the subtleties of our max/possible/present CPU specifics as outlined above. So drop the check added in v4.15 (edb93821) and make RCU and nohz_full both in alignment again on NR_CPUS so "N" works for both, and then they can fall back to nr_cpu_ids internally just as before. Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage nohz_full=2-N rcu_nocbs=2-N root=/dev/sda1 ro NO_HZ: Full dynticks CPUs: 2-5. rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 2-5. As shown above, with this change, RCU and nohz_full are in sync, even with the use of the "N" placeholder. Same result is achieved with "15". Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210419042659.1134916-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
915a2bc3