• Kees Cook's avatar
    MIPS: Modernize READ_IMPLIES_EXEC · fbb1d4b3
    Kees Cook authored
    I'm doing some thread necromancy of
    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202007081624.82FA0CC1EA@keescook/
    
    x86, arm64, and arm32 adjusted their READ_IMPLIES_EXEC logic to better
    align with the safer defaults and the interactions with other mappings,
    which I illustrated with this comment on x86:
    
    /*
     * An executable for which elf_read_implies_exec() returns TRUE will
     * have the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC personality flag set automatically.
     *
     * The decision process for determining the results are:
     *
     *                 CPU: | lacks NX*  | has NX, ia32     | has NX, x86_64 |
     * ELF:                 |            |                  |                |
     * ---------------------|------------|------------------|----------------|
     * missing PT_GNU_STACK | exec-all   | exec-all         | exec-none      |
     * PT_GNU_STACK == RWX  | exec-stack | exec-stack       | exec-stack     |
     * PT_GNU_STACK == RW   | exec-none  | exec-none        | exec-none      |
     *
     *  exec-all  : all PROT_READ user mappings are executable, except when
     *              backed by files on a noexec-filesystem.
     *  exec-none : only PROT_EXEC user mappings are executable.
     *  exec-stack: only the stack and PROT_EXEC user mappings are
     *  executable.
     *
     *  *this column has no architectural effect: NX markings are ignored by
     *   hardware, but may have behavioral effects when "wants X" collides with
     *   "cannot be X" constraints in memory permission flags, as in
     *   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190418055759.GA3155@mellanox.com
     *
     */
    
    For MIPS, the "lacks NX" above is the "!cpu_has_rixi" check. On x86,
    we decided that the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC flag needed to reflect the
    expectations, not the architectural behavior due to bad interactions
    as noted above, as always returning "1" on non-NX hardware breaks
    some mappings.
    
    The other part of the issue is "what does the MIPS toolchain do for
    PT_GNU_STACK?" The answer seems to be "by default, include PT_GNU_STACK,
    but mark it executable" (likely due to concerns over non-NX hardware):
    
    $ mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc -o hello_world hello_world.c
    $ llvm-readelf -lW hellow_world | grep GNU_STACK
      GNU_STACK      0x000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000 0x00000 RWE 0x10
    
    Given that older hardware doesn't support non-executable memory, it
    seems safe to make the "PT_GNU_STACK is absent" logic mean "assume
    non-executable", but this might break very old software running on
    modern MIPS. This situation matches the ia32-on-x86_64 logic x86
    uses (which assumes needing READ_IMPLIES_EXEC in that situation). But
    modern toolchains on modern MIPS hardware should follow a safer default
    (assume NX stack).
    
    A follow-up to this change would be to switch the MIPS toolchain to emit
    a non-executable PT_GNU_STACK, as this seems to be unneeded.
    
    Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
    Cc: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
    Cc: Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@loongson.cn>
    Cc: Juxin Gao <gaojuxin@loongson.cn>
    Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
    Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
    fbb1d4b3
elf.c 9.31 KB