-
Paul E. McKenney authored
The TINY_PREEMPT_RCU is complex, does not provide that much memory savings, and therefore TREE_PREEMPT_RCU should be used instead. The systems where the difference between TINY_PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU are quite small compared to the memory footprint of CONFIG_PREEMPT. This commit therefore takes a first step towards eliminating TINY_PREEMPT_RCU by allowing TREE_PREEMPT_RCU to be configured on !SMP systems. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
9fc52d83