-
Daniel Vetter authored
It might be good enough on x86 with just READ_ONCE, but the write side should then at least be WRITE_ONCE because x86 has total store order. It's definitely not enough on arm. Fix this proplery, which means - explain the need for the barrier in both places - point at the other side in each comment Also pull out the !sched_list case as the first check, so that the code flow is clearer. While at it sprinkle some comments around because it was very non-obvious to me what's actually going on here and why. Note that we really need full barriers here, at first I thought store-release and load-acquire on ->last_scheduled would be enough, but we actually requiring ordering between that and the queue state. v2: Put smp_rmp() in the right place and fix up comment (Andrey) Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Acked-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210805104705.862416-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
b0a5303d