• Linus Torvalds's avatar
    Linux-0.01 (September 17, 1991) · bb441db1
    Linus Torvalds authored
    This is the initial 0.01 kernel as found on various history sites.
    
    Fun facts:
    
     - kernel/Makefile still calls it the FREAX kernel
    
     - this was in a more innocent age, when the only copyright notice
       is a single "(C) 1991 Linus Torvalds" in lib/string.h
    
     - the keyboard driver was still in all assembly language, with a
       hardcoded map for (7-bit) Finnish keyboards. At least I had converted
       the VT100 emulation from assembly to C. Too bad I didn't keep the
       _really_ old code around for historical interest.
    
     - All the early kernels wanted a special version of gcc to compile: I
       had made extensions to gcc-1.40 to make it use the x86 string
       instructions for things like "memcpy()" using the "-mstring-insns"
       command line option.
    
     - Also, note that newer versions of gcc (which do have the inline
       intrisics, quite independently of my early -mstring-insns hack) will
       not accept the code: it needs a compiler that outputs old-style a.out
       format, and that accepts some of the strange inline assembly that I
       used.
    
     - In short: you really need some stone-age tools to actually compile
       this, if you actually want to.  And if you actually want to _run_ it
       too, you need to have some old hardware and most likely edit some of
       the hardcoded numbers too.  The harddisk driver has two different
       hardcoded settings: my harddisk, and Lasu's harddisk.
    
    Statistics:
    
    It's 88 files with about ten thousand lines, written by yours truly
    except for the vsprintf routine which was co-written with Lars
    Wirzenius.  Lasu wasn't as huge a fan of inline assembly as I was, thus
    the comment
    
            "Wirzenius wrote this portably, Torvalds fucked it up :-)"
    
    I think that comment pretty much sums it up ;)
    
    Original release notes for 0.01 follow:
    
             Notes for linux release 0.01
    
             0. Contents of this directory
    
    linux-0.01.tar.Z - sources to the kernel
    bash.Z - compressed bash binary if you want to test it
    update.Z - compressed update binary
    RELNOTES-0.01 - this file
    
             1. Short intro
    
    This is a free minix-like kernel for i386(+) based AT-machines.  Full
    source is included, and this source has been used to produce a running
    kernel on two different machines.  Currently there are no kernel
    binaries for public viewing, as they have to be recompiled for different
    machines.  You need to compile it with gcc (I use 1.40, don't know if
    1.37.1 will handle all __asm__-directives), after having changed the
    relevant configuration file(s).
    
    As the version number (0.01) suggests this is not a mature product.
    Currently only a subset of AT-hardware is supported (hard-disk, screen,
    keyboard and serial lines), and some of the system calls are not yet
    fully implemented (notably mount/umount aren't even implemented).  See
    comments or readme's in the code.
    
    This version is also meant mostly for reading - ie if you are interested
    in how the system looks like currently.  It will compile and produce a
    working kernel, and though I will help in any way I can to get it
    working on your machine (mail me), it isn't really supported.  Changes
    are frequent, and the first "production" version will probably differ
    wildly from this pre-alpha-release.
    
    Hardware needed for running linux:
            - 386 AT
            - VGA/EGA screen
            - AT-type harddisk controller (IDE is fine)
            - Finnish keyboard (oh, you can use a US keyboard, but not
              without some practise :-)
    
    The Finnish keyboard is hard-wired, and as I don't have a US one I
    cannot change it without major problems. See kernel/keyboard.s for
    details. If anybody is willing to make an even partial port, I'd be
    grateful. Shouldn't be too hard, as it's tabledriven (it's assembler
    though, so ...)
    
    Although linux is a complete kernel, and uses no code from minix or
    other sources, almost none of the support routines have yet been coded.
    Thus you currently need minix to bootstrap the system. It might be
    possible to use the free minix demo-disk to make a filesystem and run
    linux without having minix, but I don't know...
    
             2. Copyrights etc
    
    This kernel is (C) 1991 Linus Torvalds, but all or part of it may be
    redistributed provided you do the following:
    
            - Full source must be available (and free), if not with the
              distribution then at least on asking for it.
    
            - Copyright notices must be intact. (In fact, if you distribute
              only parts of it you may have to add copyrights, as there aren't
              (C)'s in all files.) Small partial excerpts may be copied
              without bothering with copyrights.
    
            - You may not distibute this for a fee, not even "handling"
              costs.
    
    Mail me at "torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi" if you have any questions.
    
    Sadly, a kernel by itself gets you nowhere. To get a working system you
    need a shell, compilers, a library etc. These are separate parts and may
    be under a stricter (or even looser) copyright. Most of the tools used
    with linux are GNU software and are under the GNU copyleft. These tools
    aren't in the distribution - ask me (or GNU) for more info.
    
             3. Short technical overview of the kernel.
    
    The linux kernel has been made under minix, and it was my original idea
    to make it binary compatible with minix. That was dropped, as the
    differences got bigger, but the system still resembles minix a great
    deal. Some of the key points are:
    
            - Efficient use of the possibilities offered by the 386 chip.
              Minix was written on a 8088, and later ported to other
              machines - linux takes full advantage of the 386 (which is
              nice if you /have/ a 386, but makes porting very difficult)
    
            - No message passing, this is a more traditional approach to
              unix. System calls are just that - calls. This might or might
              not be faster, but it does mean we can dispense with some of
              the problems with messages (message queues etc). Of course, we
              also miss the nice features :-p.
    
            - Multithreaded FS - a direct consequence of not using messages.
              This makes the filesystem a bit (a lot) more complicated, but
              much nicer. Coupled with a better scheduler, this means that
              you can actually run several processes concurrently without
              the performance hit induced by minix.
    
            - Minimal task switching. This too is a consequence of not using
              messages. We task switch only when we really want to switch
              tasks - unlike minix which task-switches whatever you do. This
              means we can more easily implement 387 support (indeed this is
              already mostly implemented)
    
            - Interrupts aren't hidden. Some people (among them Tanenbaum)
              think interrupts are ugly and should be hidden. Not so IMHO.
              Due to practical reasons interrupts must be mainly handled by
              machine code, which is a pity, but they are a part of the code
              like everything else. Especially device drivers are mostly
              interrupt routines - see kernel/hd.c etc.
    
            - There is no distinction between kernel/fs/mm, and they are all
              linked into the same heap of code. This has it's good sides as
              well as bad. The code isn't as modular as the minix code, but
              on the other hand some things are simpler. The different parts
              of the kernel are under different sub-directories in the
              source tree, but when running everything happens in the same
              data/code space.
    
    The guiding line when implementing linux was: get it working fast. I
    wanted the kernel simple, yet powerful enough to run most unix software.
    The file system I couldn't do much about - it needed to be minix
    compatible for practical reasons, and the minix filesystem was simple
    enough as it was. The kernel and mm could be simplified, though:
    
            - Just one data structure for tasks. "Real" unices have task
              information in several places, I wanted everything in one
              place.
    
            - A very simple memory management algorithm, using both the
              paging and segmentation capabilities of the i386. Currently
              MM is just two files - memory.c and page.s, just a couple of
              hundreds of lines of code.
    
    These decisions seem to have worked out well - bugs were easy to spot,
    and things work.
    
             4. The "kernel proper"
    
    All the routines handling tasks are in the subdirectory "kernel". These
    include things like 'fork' and 'exit' as well as scheduling and minor
    system calls like 'getpid' etc. Here are also the handlers for most
    exceptions and traps (not page faults, they are in mm), and all
    low-level device drivers (get_hd_block, tty_write etc). Currently all
    faults lead to a exit with error code 11 (Segmentation fault), and the
    system seems to be relatively stable ("crashme" hasn't - yet).
    
             5. Memory management
    
    This is the simplest of all parts, and should need only little changes.
    It contains entry-points for some things that the rest of the kernel
    needs, but mostly copes on it's own, handling page faults as they
    happen. Indeed, the rest of the kernel usually doesn't actively allocate
    pages, and just writes into user space, letting mm handle any possible
    'page-not-present' errors.
    
    Memory is dealt with in two completely different ways - by paging and
    segmentation.  First the 386 VM-space (4GB) is divided into a number of
    segments (currently 64 segments of 64Mb each), the first of which is the
    kernel memory segment, with the complete physical memory identity-mapped
    into it.  All kernel functions live within this area.
    
    Tasks are then given one segment each, to use as they wish. The paging
    mechanism sees to filling the segment with the appropriate pages,
    keeping track of any duplicate copies (created at a 'fork'), and making
    copies on any write. The rest of the system doesn't need to know about
    all this.
    
             6. The file system
    
    As already mentioned, the linux FS is the same as in minix. This makes
    crosscompiling from minix easy, and means you can mount a linux
    partition from minix (or the other way around as soon as I implement
    mount :-). This is only on the logical level though - the actual
    routines are very different.
    
            NOTE! Minix-1.6.16 seems to have a new FS, with minor
            modifications to the 1.5.10 I've been using. Linux
            won't understand the new system.
    
    The main difference is in the fact that minix has a single-threaded
    file-system and linux hasn't. Implementing a single-threaded FS is much
    easier as you don't need to worry about other processes allocating
    buffer blocks etc while you do something else. It also means that you
    lose some of the multiprocessing so important to unix.
    
    There are a number of problems (deadlocks/raceconditions) that the linux
    kernel needed to address due to multi-threading.  One way to inhibit
    race-conditions is to lock everything you need, but as this can lead to
    unnecessary blocking I decided never to lock any data structures (unless
    actually reading or writing to a physical device).  This has the nice
    property that dead-locks cannot happen.
    
    Sadly it has the not so nice property that race-conditions can happen
    almost everywhere.  These are handled by double-checking allocations etc
    (see fs/buffer.c and fs/inode.c).  Not letting the kernel schedule a
    task while it is in supervisor mode (standard unix practise), means that
    all kernel/fs/mm actions are atomic (not counting interrupts, and we are
    careful when writing those) if you don't call 'sleep', so that is one of
    the things we can count on.
    
             7. Apologies :-)
    
    This isn't yet the "mother of all operating systems", and anyone who
    hoped for that will have to wait for the first real release (1.0), and
    even then you might not want to change from minix.  This is a source
    release for those that are interested in seeing what linux looks like,
    and it's not really supported yet.  Anyone with questions or suggestions
    (even bug-reports if you decide to get it working on your system) is
    encouraged to mail me.
    
             8. Getting it working
    
    Most hardware dependancies will have to be compiled into the system, and
    there a number of defines in the file "include/linux/config.h" that you
    have to change to get a personalized kernel.  Also you must uncomment
    the right "equ" in the file boot/boot.s, telling the bootup-routine what
    kind of device your A-floppy is.  After that a simple "make" should make
    the file "Image", which you can copy to a floppy (cp Image /dev/PS0 is
    what I use with a 1.44Mb floppy).  That's it.
    
    Without any programs to run, though, the kernel cannot do anything. You
    should find binaries for 'update' and 'bash' at the same place you found
    this, which will have to be put into the '/bin' directory on the
    specified root-device (specified in config.h). Bash must be found under
    the name '/bin/sh', as that's what the kernel currently executes. Happy
    hacking.
    
             Linus Torvalds "torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi"
             Petersgatan 2 A 2
             00140 Helsingfors 14
             FINLAND
    bb441db1
file_table.c 56 Bytes