-
Dave Hansen authored
The comment pretty much says it all. I wrote a test program that does lots of random allocations and forces bounds tables to be created. It came up with a layout like this: .... | BOUNDS DIRECTORY ENTRY COVERS | .... | BOUNDS TABLE COVERS | | BOUNDS TABLE | REAL ALLOC | BOUNDS TABLE | Unmapping "REAL ALLOC" should have been able to free the bounds table "covering" the "REAL ALLOC" because it was the last real user. But, the neighboring VMA bounds tables were found, considered as real neighbors, and we declined to free the bounds table covering the area. Doing this over and over left a small but significant number of these orphans. Handling them is fairly straighforward. All we have to do is walk the VMAs and skip all of the MPX ones when looking for neighbors. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150607183706.A6BD90BF@viggo.jf.intel.comSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
bea03c50