-
Marijn Suijten authored
As discussed in [1] it is more convenient to use a generic `channel` node name for ADC channels while storing a friendly - board-specific instead of PMIC-specific - name in the label, if/when desired to overwrite the channel description already contained (but previously unused) in the driver [2]. The same `channel` node name pattern has also been set in iio/adc/adc.yaml, but this generic binding is not inherited as base for qcom,spmi-vadc bindings due to not having any other generic elements in common, besides the node name rule and reg property. Replace the .* name pattern with the `channel` literal, but leave the label property optional for bindings to choose to fall back a channel label hardcoded in the driver [2] instead. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221106193018.270106-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/T/#u [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230116220909.196926-4-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230410202917.247666-6-marijn.suijten@somainline.orgSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
e0b79724