Sergei Trofimovich reported a regression [0] caused by commit a0ade840
("af_packet: Fix warning of fortified memcpy() in packet_getname().").

It introduced a flex array sll_addr_flex in struct sockaddr_ll as a
union-ed member with sll_addr to work around the fortified memcpy() check.

However, a userspace program uses a struct that has struct sockaddr_ll in
the middle, where a flex array is illegal to exist.

  include/linux/if_packet.h:24:17: error: flexible array member 'sockaddr_ll::<unnamed union>::<unnamed struct>::sll_addr_flex' not at end of 'struct packet_info_t'
     24 |                 __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(unsigned char, sll_addr_flex);
        |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To fix the regression, let's go back to the first attempt [1] telling
memcpy() the actual size of the array.
Reported-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/252587#issuecomment-1741733002 [0]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230720004410.87588-3-kuniyu@amazon.com/ [1]
Fixes: a0ade840 ("af_packet: Fix warning of fortified memcpy() in packet_getname().")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009153151.75688-1-kuniyu@amazon.comSigned-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>