-
Hans de Goede authored
commit dd242a08 upstream. At least on the UP board SBC both PWMs are enabled leading to us trying to add the same pwm_lookup twice, which leads to the following: [ 0.902224] list_add double add: new=ffffffffb8efd400, prev=ffffffffb8efd400, next=ffffffffb8eeede0. [ 0.912466] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.917624] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:31! [ 0.922588] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP ... [ 1.027450] Call Trace: [ 1.030185] pwm_add_table+0x4c/0x90 [ 1.034181] bsw_pwm_setup+0x1a/0x20 [ 1.038175] acpi_lpss_create_device+0xfe/0x420 ... This commit fixes this by only calling pwm_add_table() for the first PWM controller (which is the one used for the backlight). Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458599 Fixes: bf7696a1 (acpi: lpss: call pwm_add_table() for BSW...) Fixes: 04434ab5 (ACPI / LPSS: Call pwm_add_table() for Bay Trail...) Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
e54f1632