-
Yu Kuai authored
The updating of 'bfqg->ref' should be protected by 'bfqd->lock', however, during code review, we found that bfq_pd_free() update 'bfqg->ref' without holding the lock, which is problematic: 1) bfq_pd_free() triggered by removing cgroup is called asynchronously; 2) bfqq will grab bfqg reference, and exit bfqq will drop the reference, which can concurrent with 1). Unfortunately, 'bfqd->lock' can't be held here because 'bfqd' might already be freed in bfq_pd_free(). Fix the problem by using atomic refcount apis. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103084755.1256479-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
216f7647