-
Sinan Kaya authored
We do not want to store the SCI penalty in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] only holds ISA IRQ penalties and there's no guarantee that the SCI is an ISA IRQ. We add in the SCI penalty as a special case in acpi_irq_get_penalty(). But if we called acpi_penalize_isa_irq() or acpi_irq_penalty_update() for an SCI that happened to be an ISA IRQ, they stored the SCI penalty (part of the acpi_irq_get_penalty() return value) in acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]. Subsequent calls to acpi_irq_get_penalty() returned a penalty that included *two* SCI penalties. Fixes: 103544d8 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements) Signed-off-by:
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> Acked-by:
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Tested-by:
Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
eeaed4bb