-
Ido Schimmel authored
Currently, when port netdevs (or their uppers) are enslaved to a bridge, we simply propagate the CHANGEUPPER event all the way down and lose the context of the actual netdevice used as the bridge port. This leads to a lot of information hanging off the ports (and vPorts), which doesn't logically belong there, such as mrouter indication and unknown unicast flood state. Following patches are going to put the mlxsw_sp_port struct on diet and instead introduce a bridge port struct, where the above mentioned information belongs. But in order to do that, we need to be able to determine the bridge port netdevice, so propagate it down. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
f0cebd81