Commit 00beb246 authored by Boqun Feng's avatar Boqun Feng Committed by Ben Hutchings

powerpc: Make value-returning atomics fully ordered

commit 49e9cf3f upstream.

According to memory-barriers.txt:

> Any atomic operation that modifies some state in memory and returns
> information about the state (old or new) implies an SMP-conditional
> general memory barrier (smp_mb()) on each side of the actual
> operation ...

Which mean these operations should be fully ordered. However on PPC,
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER is the barrier before the actual operation,
which is currently "lwsync" if SMP=y. The leading "lwsync" can not
guarantee fully ordered atomics, according to Paul Mckenney:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/14/970

To fix this, we define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER as "sync" to guarantee
the fully-ordered semantics.

This also makes futex atomics fully ordered, which can avoid possible
memory ordering problems if userspace code relies on futex system call
for fully ordered semantics.

Fixes: b97021f8 ("powerpc: Fix atomic_xxx_return barrier semantics")
Signed-off-by: default avatarBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
parent 516e06bf
......@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void isync(void)
MAKE_LWSYNC_SECTION_ENTRY(97, __lwsync_fixup);
#define PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "\n" stringify_in_c(__PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER)
#define PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER stringify_in_c(LWSYNC) "\n"
#define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER "\n" stringify_in_c(LWSYNC) "\n"
#define PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER "\n" stringify_in_c(sync) "\n"
#define PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER "\n" stringify_in_c(sync) "\n"
#else
#define PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment