Commit 01085e24 authored by Rasmus Villemoes's avatar Rasmus Villemoes Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

devtmpfs: actually reclaim some init memory

Currently gcc seems to inline devtmpfs_setup() into devtmpfsd(), so
its memory footprint isn't reclaimed as intended. Mark it noinline to
make sure it gets put in .init.text.

While here, setup_done can also be put in .init.data: After complete()
releases the internal spinlock, the completion object is never touched
again by that thread, and the waiting thread doesn't proceed until it
observes ->done while holding that spinlock.

This is now the same pattern as for kthreadd_done in init/main.c:
complete() is done in a __ref function, while the corresponding
wait_for_completion() is in an __init function.
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312103027.2701413-2-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dkSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 38f087de
......@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ int __init devtmpfs_mount(void)
return err;
}
static DECLARE_COMPLETION(setup_done);
static __initdata DECLARE_COMPLETION(setup_done);
static int handle(const char *name, umode_t mode, kuid_t uid, kgid_t gid,
struct device *dev)
......@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static void __noreturn devtmpfs_work_loop(void)
}
}
static int __init devtmpfs_setup(void *p)
static noinline int __init devtmpfs_setup(void *p)
{
int err;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment