Commit 0222dfdd authored by David Sterba's avatar David Sterba

btrfs: rename extent buffer block group item accessors

Accessors defined by BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS take a raw extent buffer and
manipulate the items there, there's no special prefix required. The
block group accessors had _disk_ because previously the names were
occupied by the on-stack accessors. As this has been addressed in the
previous patch, we can now unify the naming.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent de0dc456
......@@ -1521,14 +1521,14 @@ static inline u64 btrfs_stripe_devid_nr(struct extent_buffer *eb,
/* struct btrfs_block_group_item */
BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_block_group_used, struct btrfs_block_group_item,
used, 64);
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(disk_block_group_used, struct btrfs_block_group_item,
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(block_group_used, struct btrfs_block_group_item,
used, 64);
BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_block_group_chunk_objectid,
struct btrfs_block_group_item, chunk_objectid, 64);
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(disk_block_group_chunk_objectid,
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(block_group_chunk_objectid,
struct btrfs_block_group_item, chunk_objectid, 64);
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(disk_block_group_flags,
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(block_group_flags,
struct btrfs_block_group_item, flags, 64);
BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_block_group_flags,
struct btrfs_block_group_item, flags, 64);
......
......@@ -266,9 +266,9 @@ void btrfs_print_leaf(struct extent_buffer *l)
struct btrfs_block_group_item);
pr_info(
"\t\tblock group used %llu chunk_objectid %llu flags %llu\n",
btrfs_disk_block_group_used(l, bi),
btrfs_disk_block_group_chunk_objectid(l, bi),
btrfs_disk_block_group_flags(l, bi));
btrfs_block_group_used(l, bi),
btrfs_block_group_chunk_objectid(l, bi),
btrfs_block_group_flags(l, bi));
break;
case BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY:
print_chunk(l, btrfs_item_ptr(l, i,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment