Commit 033dc8f0 authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: divider: fix calculation of maximal parent rate for a given divider

commit da321133 upstream.

The rate provided at the output of a clk-divider is calculated as:

	DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, div)

since commit b11d282d (clk: divider: fix rate calculation for
fractional rates). So to yield a rate not bigger than r parent_rate
must be <= r * div.

The effect of choosing a parent rate that is too big as was done before
this patch results in wrongly ruling out good dividers.

Note that this is not a complete fix as __clk_round_rate might return a
value >= its 2nd parameter. Also for dividers with
CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST set the calculation is not accurate. But this
fixes the test case by Sascha Hauer that uses a chain of three dividers
under a fixed clock.

Fixes: b11d282d (clk: divider: fix rate calculation for fractional rates)
Suggested-by: default avatarSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 765c2045
......@@ -129,12 +129,6 @@ static unsigned long clk_divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
return DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, div);
}
/*
* The reverse of DIV_ROUND_UP: The maximum number which
* divided by m is r
*/
#define MULT_ROUND_UP(r, m) ((r) * (m) + (m) - 1)
static bool _is_valid_table_div(const struct clk_div_table *table,
unsigned int div)
{
......@@ -304,7 +298,7 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
return i;
}
parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk),
MULT_ROUND_UP(rate, i));
rate * i);
now = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, i);
if (_is_best_div(divider, rate, now, best)) {
bestdiv = i;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment