Commit 0399d0e3 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915/selftests: Rearrange ktime_get to reduce latency against CS

In our tests where we measure the elapsed time on both the CPU and CS
using a udelay, our CS results match the udelay much more accurately
than the ktime (even when using ktime_get_fast_ns). With preemption
disabled, we can go one step lower than ktime and use local_clock.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2919Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210108204026.20682-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent c318a203
...@@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ static int __measure_timestamps(struct intel_context *ce, ...@@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ static int __measure_timestamps(struct intel_context *ce,
/* Run the request for a 100us, sampling timestamps before/after */ /* Run the request for a 100us, sampling timestamps before/after */
preempt_disable(); preempt_disable();
*dt = ktime_get_raw_fast_ns(); *dt = local_clock();
write_semaphore(&sema[2], 0); write_semaphore(&sema[2], 0);
udelay(100); udelay(100);
*dt = local_clock() - *dt;
write_semaphore(&sema[2], 1); write_semaphore(&sema[2], 1);
*dt = ktime_get_raw_fast_ns() - *dt;
preempt_enable(); preempt_enable();
if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0) { if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment