Commit 043862b0 authored by Chuck Lever's avatar Chuck Lever

NFSD: Add documenting comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner()

And return explicit nfserr values that match what is documented in the
new comment / API contract.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
parent bd8fdb6e
......@@ -7524,6 +7524,23 @@ check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner)
return status;
}
/**
* nfsd4_release_lockowner - process NFSv4.0 RELEASE_LOCKOWNER operations
* @rqstp: RPC transaction
* @cstate: NFSv4 COMPOUND state
* @u: RELEASE_LOCKOWNER arguments
*
* The lockowner's so_count is bumped when a lock record is added
* or when copying a conflicting lock. The latter case is brief,
* but can lead to fleeting false positives when looking for
* locks-in-use.
*
* Return values:
* %nfs_ok: lockowner released or not found
* %nfserr_locks_held: lockowner still in use
* %nfserr_stale_clientid: clientid no longer active
* %nfserr_expired: clientid not recognized
*/
__be32
nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
......@@ -7550,7 +7567,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
lo = find_lockowner_str_locked(clp, &rlockowner->rl_owner);
if (!lo) {
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
return status;
return nfs_ok;
}
if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_owner.so_count) != 2) {
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
......@@ -7566,11 +7583,11 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
put_ol_stateid_locked(stp, &reaplist);
}
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist);
remove_blocked_locks(lo);
nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner);
return status;
return nfs_ok;
}
static inline struct nfs4_client_reclaim *
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment