Commit 05b78d29 authored by Matthew Auld's avatar Matthew Auld Committed by Matt Roper

drm/i915/xehp: Changes to ss/eu definitions

Xe_HP no longer has "slices" in the same way that old platforms did.
There are new concepts (gslices, cslices, mslices) that apply in various
contexts, but for the purposes of fusing slices no longer exist and we
just have one large pool of dual-subslices (DSS) to work with.
Furthermore, the meaning of the DSS fuse is inverted compared to past
platforms --- it now specifies which DSS are enabled rather than which
ones are disabled.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRadhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPrasad Nallani <prasad.nallani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729170008.2836648-9-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
parent e0531636
......@@ -139,17 +139,33 @@ static void gen12_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
* Gen12 has Dual-Subslices, which behave similarly to 2 gen11 SS.
* Instead of splitting these, provide userspace with an array
* of DSS to more closely represent the hardware resource.
*
* In addition, the concept of slice has been removed in Xe_HP.
* To be compatible with prior generations, assume a single slice
* across the entire device. Then calculate out the DSS for each
* workload type within that software slice.
*/
intel_sseu_set_info(sseu, 1, 6, 16);
s_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_GT_SLICE_ENABLE) &
GEN11_GT_S_ENA_MASK;
/*
* As mentioned above, Xe_HP does not have the concept of a slice.
* Enable one for software backwards compatibility.
*/
if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50))
s_en = 0x1;
else
s_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_GT_SLICE_ENABLE) &
GEN11_GT_S_ENA_MASK;
dss_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN12_GT_DSS_ENABLE);
/* one bit per pair of EUs */
eu_en_fuse = ~(intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_EU_DISABLE) &
GEN11_EU_DIS_MASK);
if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(gt->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50))
eu_en_fuse = intel_uncore_read(uncore, XEHP_EU_ENABLE) & XEHP_EU_ENA_MASK;
else
eu_en_fuse = ~(intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_EU_DISABLE) &
GEN11_EU_DIS_MASK);
for (eu = 0; eu < sseu->max_eus_per_subslice / 2; eu++)
if (eu_en_fuse & BIT(eu))
eu_en |= BIT(eu * 2) | BIT(eu * 2 + 1);
......
......@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ int i915_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev->dev);
const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = &i915->gt.info.sseu;
drm_i915_getparam_t *param = data;
int value;
int value = 0;
switch (param->param) {
case I915_PARAM_IRQ_ACTIVE:
......@@ -150,7 +150,9 @@ int i915_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
return -ENODEV;
break;
case I915_PARAM_SUBSLICE_MASK:
value = sseu->subslice_mask[0];
/* Only copy bits from the first slice */
memcpy(&value, sseu->subslice_mask,
min(sseu->ss_stride, (u8)sizeof(value)));
if (!value)
return -ENODEV;
break;
......
......@@ -3156,6 +3156,9 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
#define GEN12_GT_DSS_ENABLE _MMIO(0x913C)
#define XEHP_EU_ENABLE _MMIO(0x9134)
#define XEHP_EU_ENA_MASK 0xFF
#define GEN6_BSD_SLEEP_PSMI_CONTROL _MMIO(0x12050)
#define GEN6_BSD_SLEEP_MSG_DISABLE (1 << 0)
#define GEN6_BSD_SLEEP_FLUSH_DISABLE (1 << 2)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment