Commit 07d1c91b authored by Alex Williamson's avatar Alex Williamson

iommu/amd: Fix alloc_irq_index() increment

On an is_allocated() interrupt index, we ALIGN() the current index and
then increment it via the for loop, guaranteeing that it is no longer
aligned for alignments >1.  We instead need to align the next index,
to guarantee forward progress, moving the increment-only to the case
where the index was found to be unallocated.

Fixes: 37946d95 ('iommu/amd: Add align parameter to alloc_irq_index()')
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
parent a5934725
......@@ -3682,13 +3682,12 @@ static int alloc_irq_index(u16 devid, int count, bool align)
/* Scan table for free entries */
for (index = ALIGN(table->min_index, alignment), c = 0;
index < MAX_IRQS_PER_TABLE;
index++) {
index < MAX_IRQS_PER_TABLE;) {
if (!iommu->irte_ops->is_allocated(table, index)) {
c += 1;
} else {
c = 0;
index = ALIGN(index, alignment);
index = ALIGN(index + 1, alignment);
continue;
}
......@@ -3699,6 +3698,8 @@ static int alloc_irq_index(u16 devid, int count, bool align)
index -= count - 1;
goto out;
}
index++;
}
index = -ENOSPC;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment