Commit 08f10067 authored by Nicolas Pitre's avatar Nicolas Pitre Committed by Russell King

[ARM PATCH] 1729/1: workaround for PXA timer delay problem

Patch from Nicolas Pitre

... as discussed on linux-arm-kernel.
parent fa7bfcb7
...@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static int pxa_set_rtc(void) ...@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static int pxa_set_rtc(void)
/* IRQs are disabled before entering here from do_gettimeofday() */ /* IRQs are disabled before entering here from do_gettimeofday() */
static unsigned long pxa_gettimeoffset (void) static unsigned long pxa_gettimeoffset (void)
{ {
unsigned long ticks_to_match, elapsed, usec; long ticks_to_match, elapsed, usec;
/* Get ticks before next timer match */ /* Get ticks before next timer match */
ticks_to_match = OSMR0 - OSCR; ticks_to_match = OSMR0 - OSCR;
...@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ static unsigned long pxa_gettimeoffset (void) ...@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ static unsigned long pxa_gettimeoffset (void)
/* We need elapsed ticks since last match */ /* We need elapsed ticks since last match */
elapsed = LATCH - ticks_to_match; elapsed = LATCH - ticks_to_match;
/* don't get fooled by the workaround in pxa_timer_interrupt() */
if (elapsed <= 0)
return 0;
/* Now convert them to usec */ /* Now convert them to usec */
usec = (unsigned long)(elapsed * (tick_nsec / 1000))/LATCH; usec = (unsigned long)(elapsed * (tick_nsec / 1000))/LATCH;
...@@ -59,6 +63,15 @@ pxa_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -59,6 +63,15 @@ pxa_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
* IRQs are disabled inside the loop to ensure coherence between * IRQs are disabled inside the loop to ensure coherence between
* lost_ticks (updated in do_timer()) and the match reg value, so we * lost_ticks (updated in do_timer()) and the match reg value, so we
* can use do_gettimeofday() from interrupt handlers. * can use do_gettimeofday() from interrupt handlers.
*
* HACK ALERT: it seems that the PXA timer regs aren't updated right
* away in all cases when a write occurs. We therefore compare with
* 8 instead of 0 in the while() condition below to avoid missing a
* match if OSCR has already reached the next OSMR value.
* Experience has shown that up to 6 ticks are needed to work around
* this problem, but let's use 8 to be conservative. Note that this
* affect things only when the timer IRQ has been delayed by nearly
* exactly one tick period which should be a pretty rare event.
*/ */
do { do {
do_leds(); do_leds();
...@@ -66,7 +79,7 @@ pxa_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -66,7 +79,7 @@ pxa_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
do_timer(regs); do_timer(regs);
OSSR = OSSR_M0; /* Clear match on timer 0 */ OSSR = OSSR_M0; /* Clear match on timer 0 */
next_match = (OSMR0 += LATCH); next_match = (OSMR0 += LATCH);
} while( (signed long)(next_match - OSCR) <= 0 ); } while( (signed long)(next_match - OSCR) <= 8 );
return IRQ_HANDLED; return IRQ_HANDLED;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment