Commit 09a89cc5 authored by Vikas Gupta's avatar Vikas Gupta Committed by Jakub Kicinski

bnxt_en: fix NQ resource accounting during vf creation on 57500 chips

There are 2 issues:

1. We should decrement hw_resc->max_nqs instead of hw_resc->max_irqs
   with the number of NQs assigned to the VFs.  The IRQs are fixed
   on each function and cannot be re-assigned.  Only the NQs are being
   assigned to the VFs.

2. vf_msix is the total number of NQs to be assigned to the VFs.  So
   we should decrement vf_msix from hw_resc->max_nqs.

Fixes: b16b6891 ("bnxt_en: Add SR-IOV support for 57500 chips.")
Signed-off-by: default avatarVikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 574b2bb9
...@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs, bool reset) ...@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_func_vf_resc_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int num_vfs, bool reset)
hw_resc->max_stat_ctxs -= le16_to_cpu(req->min_stat_ctx) * n; hw_resc->max_stat_ctxs -= le16_to_cpu(req->min_stat_ctx) * n;
hw_resc->max_vnics -= le16_to_cpu(req->min_vnics) * n; hw_resc->max_vnics -= le16_to_cpu(req->min_vnics) * n;
if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5) if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)
hw_resc->max_irqs -= vf_msix * n; hw_resc->max_nqs -= vf_msix;
rc = pf->active_vfs; rc = pf->active_vfs;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment