Commit 09c5f6bf authored by Raju Rangoju's avatar Raju Rangoju Committed by Jakub Kicinski

amd-xgbe: fix the SFP compliance codes check for DAC cables

The current XGBE code assumes that offset 6 of EEPROM SFP DAC (passive)
cables is NULL. However, some cables (the 5 meter and 7 meter Molex
passive cables) have non-zero data at offset 6. Fix the logic by moving
the passive cable check above the active checks, so as not to be
improperly identified as an active cable. This will fix the issue for
any passive cable that advertises 1000Base-CX in offset 6.

Fixes: abf0a1c2 ("amd-xgbe: Add support for SFP+ modules")
Signed-off-by: default avatarRaju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
Acked-by: default avatarTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent fc75c032
......@@ -1151,7 +1151,10 @@ static void xgbe_phy_sfp_parse_eeprom(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata)
}
/* Determine the type of SFP */
if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_SR)
if (phy_data->sfp_cable == XGBE_SFP_CABLE_PASSIVE &&
xgbe_phy_sfp_bit_rate(sfp_eeprom, XGBE_SFP_SPEED_10000))
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_CR;
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_SR)
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_SR;
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_LR)
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_LR;
......@@ -1167,9 +1170,6 @@ static void xgbe_phy_sfp_parse_eeprom(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata)
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_CX;
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_1GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_1GBE_CC_T)
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_T;
else if ((phy_data->sfp_cable == XGBE_SFP_CABLE_PASSIVE) &&
xgbe_phy_sfp_bit_rate(sfp_eeprom, XGBE_SFP_SPEED_10000))
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_CR;
switch (phy_data->sfp_base) {
case XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_T:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment