Commit 0b5b5a62 authored by Xin Yin's avatar Xin Yin Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: use ext4_ext_remove_space() for fast commit replay delete range

For now ,we use ext4_punch_hole() during fast commit replay delete range
procedure. But it will be affected by inode->i_size, which may not
correct during fast commit replay procedure. The following test will
failed.

-create & write foo (len 1000K)
-falloc FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE foo (range 400K - 600K)
-create & fsync bar
-falloc FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE foo (range 300K-500K)
-fsync foo
-crash before a full commit

After the fast_commit reply procedure, the range 400K-500K will not be
removed. Because in this case, when calling ext4_punch_hole() the
inode->i_size is 0, and it just retruns with doing nothing.

Change to use ext4_ext_remove_space() instead of ext4_punch_hole()
to remove blocks of inode directly.
Signed-off-by: default avatarXin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHarshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223032337.5198-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.comSigned-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
parent 5e4d0eba
......@@ -1770,11 +1770,14 @@ ext4_fc_replay_del_range(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_fc_tl *tl,
}
}
ret = ext4_punch_hole(inode,
le32_to_cpu(lrange.fc_lblk) << sb->s_blocksize_bits,
le32_to_cpu(lrange.fc_len) << sb->s_blocksize_bits);
if (ret)
jbd_debug(1, "ext4_punch_hole returned %d", ret);
down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
ret = ext4_ext_remove_space(inode, lrange.fc_lblk,
lrange.fc_lblk + lrange.fc_len - 1);
up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
if (ret) {
iput(inode);
return 0;
}
ext4_ext_replay_shrink_inode(inode,
i_size_read(inode) >> sb->s_blocksize_bits);
ext4_mark_inode_dirty(NULL, inode);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment