Commit 0c34aff5 authored by Hans J. Schultz's avatar Hans J. Schultz Committed by Paolo Abeni

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: shorten the locked section in mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn()

As only the hardware access functions up til and including
mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_mac_read() called under the interrupt handler
need to take the chip lock, we release the chip lock after this call.
The follow up code that handles the violations can run without the
chip lock held.
In further patches, the violation handler function will even be
incompatible with having the chip lock held. This due to an AB/BA
ordering inversion with rtnl_lock().
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans J. Schultz <netdev@kapio-technology.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
parent e06a9af0
......@@ -409,23 +409,25 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read_atu_violation(chip);
if (err)
goto out;
goto out_unlock;
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP, &val);
if (err)
goto out;
goto out_unlock;
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_fid_read(chip, &fid);
if (err)
goto out;
goto out_unlock;
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_data_read(chip, &entry);
if (err)
goto out;
goto out_unlock;
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_mac_read(chip, &entry);
if (err)
goto out;
goto out_unlock;
mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
spid = entry.state;
......@@ -449,13 +451,11 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
fid);
chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++;
}
mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
out:
out_unlock:
mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
dev_err(chip->dev, "ATU problem: error %d while handling interrupt\n",
err);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment