Commit 0e6255fa authored by Martin Blumenstingl's avatar Martin Blumenstingl Committed by Alexandre Belloni

rtc: meson-vrtc: Use ktime_get_real_ts64() to get the current time

The VRTC alarm register can be programmed with an amount of seconds
after which the SoC will be woken up by the VRTC timer again. We are
already converting the alarm time from meson_vrtc_set_alarm() to
"seconds since 1970". This means we also need to use "seconds since
1970" for the current time.

This fixes a problem where setting the alarm to one minute in the future
results in the firmware (which handles wakeup) to output (on the serial
console) that the system will be woken up in billions of seconds.
ktime_get_raw_ts64() returns the time since boot, not since 1970. Switch
to ktime_get_real_ts64() to fix the calculation of the alarm time and to
make the SoC wake up at the specified date/time. Also the firmware
(which manages suspend) now prints either 59 or 60 seconds until wakeup
(depending on how long it takes for the system to enter suspend).

Fixes: 6ef35398 ("rtc: Add Amlogic Virtual Wake RTC")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNeil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320212142.2355062-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
parent ab0fccc3
......@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static int meson_vrtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
struct timespec64 time;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
ktime_get_raw_ts64(&time);
ktime_get_real_ts64(&time);
rtc_time64_to_tm(time.tv_sec, tm);
return 0;
......@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused meson_vrtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
long alarm_secs;
struct timespec64 time;
ktime_get_raw_ts64(&time);
ktime_get_real_ts64(&time);
local_time = time.tv_sec;
dev_dbg(dev, "alarm_time = %lus, local_time=%lus\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment