coresight: Use platform agnostic names
So far we have reused the name of the "platform" device for the CoreSight device. But this is not very intuitive when we move to ACPI. Also, the ACPI device names have ":" in them (e.g, ARMHC97C:01), which the perf tool doesn't like very much. This patch introduces a generic naming scheme, givin more intuitive names for the devices that appear on the CoreSight bus. The names follow the pattern "prefix" followed by "index" (e.g, etm5). We maintain a list of allocated devices per "prefix" to make sure we don't allocate a new name when it is reprobed (e.g, due to unsatisifed device dependencies). So, we maintain the list of "fwnodes" of the parent devices to allocate a consistent name. All devices except the ETMs get an index allocated in the order of probing. ETMs get an index based on the CPU they are attached to. TMC devices are named using "tmc_etf", "tmc_etb", and "tmc_etr" prefixes depending on the configuration of the device. The replicators and funnels are not classified as dynamic/static anymore. One could easily figure that out by checking the presence of "mgmt" registers under sysfs. Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment